<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment Capitalist &#187; Energy Stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investmentcapitalist.com/category/energy-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com</link>
	<description>Proprietary Trading - Global Macro Investments - Trade Ideas - Capitalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tails Tails Everywhere: A Look at the Carnage from &#8220;The Glitch&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2010/05/technical_damage_stocks/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2010/05/technical_damage_stocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discretionary Traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notwithstanding my annoyance at last week&#8217;s &#8220;technical glitch&#8221; that probably made a few people over a billion dollars, the problems it caused for my programs because of extremely large tails in many stocks is a bigger hindrance. The lows set on Thursday&#8217;s sudden cascade 1000 point sell-off, although we&#8217;re being told was caused by a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding my annoyance at last week&#8217;s &#8220;technical glitch&#8221; that probably made a few people over a billion dollars, the problems it caused for my programs because of extremely large tails in many stocks is a bigger hindrance. The lows set on Thursday&#8217;s sudden cascade 1000 point sell-off, although we&#8217;re being told was caused by a &#8220;fat finger&#8221;, have short-circuited many of my models such that their output can&#8217;t really be trusted. I&#8217;m still tweaking them to compensate for the tails, but the spike above 40 in the Volatility Index plays a huge factor in the output of my models.  The number of days the VIX stays above 40 is also a factor.</p>
<p>The strongest &#8220;sector&#8221; from a long-term macro perspective unbelievably is the Biotech Index.  The chart below is monthly! Let&#8217;s keep an eye on the group for some short opportunities because the corrections are going to be hard and fast, but not for the faint of heart, or the prop guy with a tight stop-loss for the day.</p>
<p><a href="http://investmentcapitalist.com/charts/BTK_MONTHLY.htm"><img src="http://investmentcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/051010_0822_TailsTailsE12.png" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Please click on image above for higher resolution chart<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p>Is the CRB Index running its course, with an ongoing rally in the US Dollar and fires burning in Europe over severe austerity measures in countries used to Socialism? Or will the mighty Chinese economy pull us all through whatever is going on. The weekly chart of the CRB shows how it&#8217;s turning over after running into a myriad of moving averages as well as an important Fibonacci retracement level. Therefore, a good area to find short trades if we continue to fall and/or the US Dollar continues to surge, are commodity stocks.</p>
<p><a href="http://investmentcapitalist.com/charts/CRB_W.htm"><img src="http://investmentcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/051010_0822_TailsTailsE22.png" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Please click on image above for higher resolution chart</strong></span></p>
<p>On that note, here&#8217;s one idea. BP and RIG both are in severe trouble. Technically, fundamentally, from a public relations standpoint, and the amount of damages they&#8217;ll have to pay is still unknown. But although they&#8217;re good candidates to short, at some point, both stocks will be extremely attractive buys. For now, the breakaway gaps in each suggest lower prices to come. However, at the moment, both are extremely oversold, so I would only short them if they break last week&#8217;s lows. Otherwise, let&#8217;s wait for a retracement and then we&#8217;ll hit the bid.</p>
<p>For now, the most important observation I&#8217;ve made thus far is that the most reliable indicators have been Fibonacci Retracement &amp; Projection lines as well as specific moving averages. If you don&#8217;t know how to use Fib Retracements and Projections, tune in to <a href="http://www.t3live.com?action=ref=pej">my radio broadcasts on T3 Live</a>, the internet&#8217;s most advanced stock research and advisory service. In these volatile times, you need guidance from the <a href="http://www.t3live.com?action=ref=pej">best traders on Wall St</a>., who trade during the day, completely transparent, buying and selling in real time while talking on the radio explaining what&#8217;s happening. <a href="http://www.t3live.com?action=ref=pej">T3 Live</a> has been on CNBC, Fox, MSNBC and mentioned in all the major financial publications. Check it out with a <a href="http://www.t3live.com?action=ref=pej">free trial here.</a></p>
<p>There really are a tremendous amount of both long and short trade opportunities out there. The problem? Gap after gap after gap!  It gets extremely frustrating for those that try to trade  the tape rather than a portfolio strategy.  Nonetheless, it&#8217;s just a matter of finding the market&#8217;s pulse and trading with it. Right now, to be 100% directional is suicide. One shouldn&#8217;t go beyond 80/20  during the day and 60/40 overnight.  Here are some ideas on both sides. I&#8217;ll announce their entry, or trigger on the <a href="http://www.t3live.com?action=ref=pej">radio</a>:</p>
<div>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" border="0">
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 233px;"></col>
<col style="width: 246px;"></col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border: solid black 0.5pt;">
<p style="text-align: center;">LONG</p>
</td>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: solid black 0.5pt; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;">
<p style="text-align: center;">SHORT</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: solid black 0.5pt; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;">AMZN, AAPL, AIG, AXP, AONE, ASIA</td>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;">AOB, BP,BIDU, RIG, CAAS,</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: solid black 0.5pt; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;">BAX, EBAY, EMC, CSCO, DECK, CEPH</td>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;">CEO, CMED, CTRP, CYOU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: solid black 0.5pt; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;"></td>
<td style="padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid black 0.5pt; border-right: solid black 0.5pt;"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>The primary <span style="color: red;">MACRO THEME</span> for the month is going to be a rising Dollar with a flight to quality, the carry trade continues, bond markets know interest hikes are coming, probably after the streets of Europe stop burning. Short look at the commodity stocks vs. long the tech names.  Once again, I&#8217;ll be on the radio with many more names on both long and short trades. It&#8217;s been a long time since the VIX has been above 40. Let&#8217;s hope it stays here for a few weeks at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2010/05/technical_damage_stocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short and Long Plays Popping Up All Over the Place</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/12/short-and-long-plays-popping-up-all-over-the-place/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/12/short-and-long-plays-popping-up-all-over-the-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discretionary Traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/12/short-and-long-plays-popping-up-all-over-the-place/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The desk I run is an Institutional Long/Short Equity desk which tries to maintain a &#8220;market neutral&#8221; book. This doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;buy 1000 shares of IBM and 10 puts&#8221;. What market neutrality means is that one need not be concerned about the overall direction of the market, as momentum traders are, but rather have long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The desk I run is an Institutional Long/Short Equity desk which tries to maintain a &#8220;market neutral&#8221; book. This doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;buy 1000 shares of IBM and 10 puts&#8221;. What <em>market </em>neutrality means is that one need not be concerned about the overall direction of the market, as momentum traders are, but rather have long positions as well as short positions comprising their overall book. You will never catch a market neutral trader with positions pointing only in one direction. So with that said, let me share some of my ideas with you:</p>
<p>Aside from the macro backdrop that may or may not be causing a pending market correction, there are several trades popping up on my proprietary models on both sides of the market. So there are NO excuses to be purely directional when you&#8217;re proclaimed to be a market neutral Long/Short trader.</p>
<p>On the macro front, I&#8217;m generally in-line with the coordinated re-inflation of global economies via the debasing of their respective currencies. Therefore, I&#8217;m bullish long-term on things like Oil, definitely Gold, Dry and Wet Bulk Carrier fleets, Railway stocks, and Silver (perhaps more than Gold). But I&#8217;m not bullish on base metals that go into manufacturing, such as copper, aluminum, steel, etc… There&#8217;s WAY TOO MUCH production capacity or acquisition debt added at or near the top of the credit bubble, and the adjustment, although already taking place, is going to be a painful one and has a ways to go. If you want to be truly market neutral here, you would be long the producers, oil futures, gold futures, and silver futures, while short the Steel producers, copper, and base metal producers in general.</p>
<p><span style="color: red; font-size: 14pt; text-decoration: underline;"><strong><br />
SHORT TRADES</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">ADI</span></strong></span>: Has moved way above all of its major averages on consistently declining volume: negative divergence #1. Money Flow turned down on Friday&#8217;s new high: negative divergence #2. Momentum Oscillator failed to make a new high relative to the new high made in early December ahead of this consolidation: negative divergence #3. The <em>Secondary Trendline</em> is around $34 while the 10-period daily EMA is at $31. So there are actually two ways to play this: If there is a fall in the market early in the week, pick up a small lot near the $31 level and use the 10-period as your stop. The other way is to short the stock as it approaches the $34 level.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">ATHR</span>:</strong></span> This telco play is directly on its all-time highs, which haven&#8217;t been broken since November after a series of six tests. This is the seventh (lucky number perhaps)? The only odd thing about my model on this is that it shows money flow collapsing while the stock has been rising for the past several sessions. That could be a false signal due to holiday trading, but it&#8217;s worth keeping in mind. On the other hand, all momentum indicators have turned up sharply. I never buy stocks after they&#8217;ve rallied several sessions, so a pullback to $30 should be followed by one more attempt at a new high at least. I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see a break above $35 on this move, so there&#8217;s no rush, and if the stock does break above $35, I&#8217;d be a seller, legging into my short position and not a buyer, with the intention of covering my short position at or near $35. $30-$31 is a great entry on this stock.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CRM:</strong></span> Although I rarely suggest stepping in front-of a runaway train (i.e. bull market), Salesforce.com appears ready for an extremely short term pullback, ideal for the daytrader. The prior breakout high was 67.72, which directly coincides with the 10d-EMA. But remember, this stock is in a bull market, so when it&#8217;s time to close out that short, consider reversing and going long instead of just patting yourself on the back. The actual trade here is on the long side, but the MACD, Doji, and declining volume create three powerful negative divergences.</p>
<p><span style="color: #00b050; font-size: 14pt; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>LONG TRADES</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AMZN:</strong></span> Going into the Christmas season, Amazon&#8217;s channel checks were bringing back some unbelievable results. In other words, their sales went through the roof. Now we won&#8217;t know the extent of the returns they&#8217;ll face, but historically, Amazon has been one of those stocks that doesn&#8217;t react to the &#8220;item returns&#8221; line item in their following quarter. The 10p-EMA just crossed the 24p-EMA on Wed. Don&#8217;t let the declining volume on Friday fool you, with what appears to the &#8220;technician&#8221; as a Doji. This is classic chart painting for those that follow technical analysis like it&#8217;s their dogma. Friday was a ghost town on Wall Street, so one could have pretty much done whatever they wanted in terms of end-of-day chart painting. That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t put too much weight into Technical Analysis as a valid tool in understanding market theory, especially when it comes to the markets&#8217; micro-structure. If anything, it must be used within a much larger plethora of quantitative tools. With regards to Amazon, the stock spent the past 2 months consolidating the move from $92 to $125. Above $140 it&#8217;s a potential buy, using the 10p-EMA as your stop.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BCS:</strong></span> As I said before, I&#8217;m not a huge fan of Technical Analysis, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m not going to make myself an expert at it. It&#8217;s just another tool in my arsenal. Barclays bank, if it hits $15, will have corrected 40% since its&#8217; October highs. Remember, this is the ADR so it&#8217;s thin. Not a daytrading stock at all! I think $15 is a low-risk entry point, perhaps risking $0.70 to make about $3 to $5.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BRCM:</strong></span> Something tells me this stock wants to test $35-$36. For a long position, use the 10d-EMA, leg into your long position, and leg out as it approaches the whole number.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CEO:</strong></span> Something of an anomaly in China, with a P/E of 16 and an EPS $9.57 per share, their 5-year growth rate is phenomenal but their most recent numbers aren&#8217;t all that great, but which oil producer didn&#8217;t suffer this past year? The anomalies lie in their TTM growth rate of almost 56% while their debt to cover ratio is 2.6 with their peer group being closer to 1.26! I wish American companies were run as tight as CNOOC. Their costs of revenues have shrunk while their income has stayed relatively flat in spite of the dramatic collapse in oil prices. As a <em>long-term</em> position, I would start building a line around the 155-157 level and hold it until at least $200. However, during that time, you should always trade around your core position to lock in Alpha. Here are some ratios for CEO:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://investmentcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/122909_0910_ShortandLon1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CP:</strong></span> Watch the $55 level. Having closed $.25 below it, I&#8217;m fairly certain it will bust through $55 in order to clear out the stops resting there, then will fall back down below to nail the ensuing protective stops established on the prior buy through $55. Nonetheless, the stock is in a powerful long-term uptrend which will prevail for the foreseeable future, if not the next several years. For short-term traders, the $55 level will provide for rapid trading on both sides, for the long-term swing/position trader, wait to see what happens. These stocks don&#8217;t move like tech stocks, although last year a few did. I actually look at this stock, and the sector, as a growth sector. So for them to have low double digit P/E&#8217;s and paying out dividends makes this a solid play, especially with the macro backdrop I mentioned. Lastly, as the Great Sage of Omaha likes to say: &#8220;Does it generate cash that ends up in their bank accounts? If it does, I&#8217;d like to take a look at the stock&#8221;.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CSX:</strong></span> Another railroad breaking into new 52-wk highs. Everything looks good here except the fact that the market broke above the 52-wk high on the day after Christmas, which means a lot of stops were just cleared out and the next step is likely down before ultimately resuming its uptrend. So if you&#8217;re a daytrader, feel free to trade the short side and then reverse. All you others out there, keep an eye here and go long when you see the whites of their eyes.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>CYOU</strong></span>: Remember this Chinese stock went public May of this year. Once the majority of lock-ups expired, insiders cashed out, as expected. Now, 28-30 has become a major accumulation zone and the stock appears ready to break out. Yes we were on Christmas schedule last week, but the Chinese are communists. First upside target is $40</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>DRE:</strong></span> Duke Realty bottomed around $12 in March and after regressing back to the $10 level where it should have been if there weren&#8217;t a liquidity crisis, the stock seems to be poised for an extended up move. All my models have triggered on this one, which is rare and actually makes me a tad more cautious rather than feeling like I should go all-in. However, the stock has had 7 green sticks in a row, so be patient and buy it on a test or break below $12 and keep legging into the trade until $11.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>EQIX:</strong></span> This is the trend followers dream stock. Every single metric is growing at an impressive pace, and the company is throwing off cash by the truck-load, and almost all of it is being plowed right back into the business. Obviously, the stock has the benefit of every single moving average below it, with the most consistent being the 10d-EMA (as always). Since $100 is a whole number which has yet to be tested following the recent break above that level, I&#8217;d like to buy it around $100, legging into my position as always.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ESLR:</strong></span> Another potential high flier when it gets wings is Evergreen Solar. The chart below shows a very sensitive and potentially explosive move. However, although I put the odds in the favor of an upside breakout, there is a chance there will be a quick spike down to shake out all the weak hands, so be careful and watch.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://investmentcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/122909_0910_ShortandLon2.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/12/short-and-long-plays-popping-up-all-over-the-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macro Signals&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/macro-signals/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/macro-signals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discretionary Traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gold went over $1000 and sustained a rally to $1020. A dip to test, and re-test $1000 is likely. This magical number will continue to be used as the line at which bulls and bears continue to thrash each other relentlessly like a tug-of-war match in an Ultimate Fighting chained rink. I&#8217;m watching the 70.50 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold went over $1000 and sustained a rally to $1020. A dip to test, and re-test $1000 is likely. This magical number will continue to be used as the line at which bulls and bears continue to thrash each other relentlessly like a tug-of-war match in an Ultimate Fighting chained rink.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m watching the 70.50 level like a hawk in Oil, as are several prominent hedgies I dialogue with on a daily basis. Right now, until Crude breaks above $71, I really like the spread of Short Crude vs Long Nat. Gas. I would lift the short side on a sustained break above $71 in Crude and get long and strong the entire energy complex, including equities.</p>
<p>The Dollar is beginning to weaken across all currencies rather than isolated instances, as was the case throughout the summer, when the Greenback showed strength against many majors. However, it now appears the floor for the US Dollar is being tested and probes are underway to see where the Federal Reserve will likely begin to increase its open market activities along with the US Treasury. It&#8217;s too early for a &#8220;strong&#8221; dollar in this economic bounce. Too many talking heads came out and said the worst is behind us. Which of course means that it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Keep an eye on Copper. China opened its mouth at the start of summer and swallowed this base metal like a wild boar, which threw off a lot of macro models because Copper is, of course, watched as a leading indicator of economic recovery. However, being that China was behaving like the gluttonous behemoth that it is, it could have just been a strategic build-up of reserves, or a hedge gone bad that needed to be covered. With China, we never know these days. Capitalism being so new to them, they&#8217;re like an over-grown kid on a high school football team that&#8217;s never played the sport but the coach puts him in there because he&#8217;s so big. Clumsy and stupid at times, ultimately very bad at playing their cards close to the chest and equally bad at not giving out the wrong signals and then chasing their own tale ex-poste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/macro-signals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invitation to Join New LinkedIn Group</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/invitation-to-join-linkedin-group-i-created/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/invitation-to-join-linkedin-group-i-created/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Algorithm Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discretionary Traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all of the clutter and insanity due to groups turning into recruiting grounds and advertising forums for esoteric and mindless products, I was compelled to launch my own LinkedIn Group which is being emphatically embraced by the systematic and discretionary proprietary trading universe, to my delight. I know many of you are Prop. Traders, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of the clutter and insanity due to groups turning into recruiting grounds and advertising forums for esoteric and mindless products, I was compelled to launch my own LinkedIn Group which is being emphatically embraced by the systematic and discretionary proprietary trading universe, to my delight.</p>
<p>I know many of you are Prop. Traders, whether equities or swaps or paper, or whatever. It doesn&#8217;t matter. The forum is to exchange ideas and share trades and various perspectives from highly qualified and advanced traders around the world (including myself, of course).  It goes without saying that if your LinkedIn Profile indicates you are a recruiter, or unrelated to content of the group, your request to join will sadly but most assuredly be declined.</p>
<p>With that being said, I invite you to join <a title="Click Here to Join" href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupRegistration?gid=2267160"><em><strong>Discretionary Proprietary Traders Worldwide</strong></em></a></p>
<h6><span style="color: #ffffff;">prop trading, proprietary trading, prop traders, prop, T3 Live, First New York, FNY, Millenium Partners, SMB Capital, discretionary trading, traders, trader, trading seats, Hold Brothers, Hold, Avatar, Avatar Securities, Scott Redler, T3 Partners, T3 Partners LLC, Sean Hendelman, Marc Sperling, Laz, Sperls, Red Dog, RBC, RBC Capital, RBC Professional Traders Group, high volatility, high frequency, high frequency/high volatility, global macro, incremental capital, dimension, cash equities, stock trading, leveraged trading, scottrade, ameritrade, Valez Capital, Pristine, chart patterns, technical analysis, protrade,</span></h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/09/invitation-to-join-linkedin-group-i-created/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sober View of Neo-Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/03/neocapitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/03/neocapitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/03/436/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real action behind the scenes. This is monumental. No, &#8220;GENERATIONAL&#8221;. No&#8230; it&#8217;s&#8230; it&#8217;s &#8230; Politics aside, the reality is thus, according to my dogma, the Financial Times: Lawrence Summers, senior economic adviser to Barack Obama, US president, told the Financial Times recently that the Group of 20 countries should agree to boost government demand. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The real action behind the scenes. This is monumental. No, &#8220;GENERATIONAL&#8221;. No&#8230; it&#8217;s&#8230; it&#8217;s &#8230;</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>Politics aside, the reality is thus, according to my dogma, the <a id="eapf" title="Financial Times" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cbc200e6-0cda-11de-a555-0000779fd2ac.html">Financial Times</a>:</div>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr">
<div><a class="bodystrong" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5d8b5e18-0c14-11de-b87d-0000779fd2ac.html"><strong><span style="color: #003399;">Lawrence Summers</span></strong></a>, senior economic adviser to Barack Obama, US president, told the Financial Times recently that the Group of 20 countries should agree to boost government demand. On Monday Christina Romer, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said: <strong><em>“The more that countries throughout the world can move toward monetary and fiscal expansion, the better off we will all be</em></strong>.” (emphasis mine)</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr">
<div>Jean-Claude Juncker, chair of the “eurogroup” of ministers, said: “The 16 finance ministers agreed that recent American appeals insisting Europeans make an added budgetary effort were <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong>not to our liking</strong></em></span>.”</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Na ah, he did not just say that, uh uh&#8230;.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>Seriously folks, is this really happening? An ultra unorthodox liberal cramming idealistic socialism down the throats of the neo-liberal Europeans? Pinch me. I must be dreaming.</div>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr">
<div>But European ministers are concerned that building up more government debt would threaten the stability of the eurozone and say that they want to assess the effects of spending boosts that have already been passed before considering more. The US Treasury declined to comment on their remarks on Monday.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Oh, I get it now. So what they&#8217;re really saying is that:</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>FINALLY, WE CAN GET ON WITH THE BUSINESS AT HAND, WHICH WE&#8217;VE BEEN SAYING FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS: STATE PARTICIPATION WITHIN THE CIVIC FOUNDATION OF SOCIETY IS NECESSARY AND CRUCIAL TO A SOLID FOUNDATION TO A GLOBAL ECONOMY. The Forbest 500 can get on with it.</div>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr">
<div>A new European Union policy paper, due to be approved by finance ministers today, calls the prospects of a return to economic growth next year “highly uncertain”.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Ouch. I do recall hearing this over the audio squawk during market hours, and the market went into a sharp sell-off. These days, that&#8217;s more likely to be a bear raid during a vulnerable moment in the tape. Either way, a professional trader should not forget to pay attention to these minor details.</p>
<p>After the powerful bear market rally of the prior two days, gold and bonds are both being bid higher. The Yen is starting to rally. Asian stocks couldn&#8217;t pick up on strength in US equities. Market breadth is deteriorating. Watch out below&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/03/neocapitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Ideas for Thur/Fri</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/trading-ideas-thurfri/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/trading-ideas-thurfri/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Thursday: JPM- Top name. Target size is 3 boats. Work hard for it. Confirmed/Qualified 12 count. Assume all insiders have been massive buyers over prior several weeks at unheard of prices. This is where crowd psychology starts to shift, and the beginning of the momentum shift is always the toughest AND most profitable. FOCUS&#8230;FOCUS&#8230;FOCUS&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Thursday:</p>
<p>JPM- Top name. Target size is 3 boats. Work hard for it. Confirmed/Qualified 12 count.<br />
Assume all insiders have been massive buyers over prior several weeks at unheard of prices. This is where crowd psychology starts to shift, and the beginning of the momentum shift is always the toughest AND most profitable. FOCUS&#8230;FOCUS&#8230;FOCUS&#8230;</p>
<p>MS- #2 in sector. Amazing accumulation all day long.</p>
<p>If SKF &lt; $149 then 134, 127, 123.50. If enough stock not in inventory, look at FAZ short (non-threshold stock)</p>
<p>Homebuilders at lower end of this base. I see this group as a leader over next several quarters. Perfect pscyhology trade: CTX, LEN</p>
<p>OIH/ERX/USO/UNG- Confirmed 9 count with nice looking stick. Entire energy complex poised to readjust for some recovery of demand. Spread between WTI and Brent closing, indicating a market in less distress. Will there be too large of a gap? Note, nat.gas stocks deeply depressed and heavily shorted (CHK, CNX,</p>
<p>FAS/BGU- Wow, this is a first. A confirmed AND qualified 9 count reversal in a triple LONG ETF. Load the boat.</p>
<p>UYG- Red flag on Dow Jones US Fin&#8217;l Index. Today was an inside day to Tuesday&#8217;s massacre on huge volume. Action should be in commodity and infrastructure stocks; use financials to balance Long/Short book.</p>
<p>BAC- 10 count, unqualified but VERY close. Anticipate qualification if possible.</p>
<p>CME- What a powerful rally all day. Very impressive and shows enormous velocity. Much energy still remains in this rally. Manage Thurs. gap and ride back to $225.</p>
<p>CRM/VMW- Expect big upside gap, but certainly confirmed pivot. Would like to catch some of this move to $35/$26.</p>
<p>JBL- Nice pivot. Back to $8. Also: MRVL, MBI</p>
<p>WYNN- Unqualified 9 count. Watch.</p>
<p>CAT- This could be final pivot I was waiting for. This is the &#8220;infrastructure&#8221; general.<br />
X- Perfect base built on $30. To $38 first stop.<br />
AKS- Excellent oppty. to pick up under $10. Last call before this ship sails&#8230;<br />
ACI- Similar base at $16. Good for pivot reversal to $20. Huge positive divergence in Money Flow during last break to new lows in November.<br />
AGU- Same set-up as ACI.</p>
<p>Look, all correlations are still at 1, so why spread out across so many names when we can just take a massive position in one of these? See if there&#8217;s any edge gained from building portfolio versus acute concentration in a few names.</p>
<p>Airlines downgraded on a day like this? What does this remind you of? Back in the days when big boys would downgrade in the face of a rally as large institutional clients have unfinished accumulations in the pipeline at specific price zones. This is cash money to the firms, they need these orders filled or it will decimate their month-end post-trade reporting. Most of the pain taken by American anyway. Others sold off from arbitrage traders.</p>
<p>AAI- Buy this already and stop looking at it. This is silly. Get long and strong.</p>
<p>Got to watch solars. This is their line in the sand where this rally should take off. Positive wires on solar and Obama today and should likely continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/trading-ideas-thurfri/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caught the Turn, Now Lets Eat&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/jan21_market_thought/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/jan21_market_thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Discipline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or should I say &#8220;feast&#8221;, to better reflect my opinion? Perfect catch of the turn. Having switched from net short to net long mid day and scored doubles on both sides is excellent for a typically uneventful Wed. Nevertheless, should have crushed it beyond what was achieved. Seems like overly cautious following prior 8 weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;">Or should I say &#8220;feast&#8221;, to better reflect my opinion?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p>Perfect catch of the turn. Having switched from net short to net long mid day and scored doubles on both sides is excellent for a typically uneventful Wed. Nevertheless, should have crushed it beyond what was achieved. Seems like overly cautious following prior 8 weeks of illiquid activity. Taking trades way too early. You gotta let em run much longer and farther. Usually, I switch modes from reversal trading to momentum based strategies a few days into a confirmed move. Instead, proceed on basis that reversal has been confirmed.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p>All the breadth, psychology/sentiment, volume and macro variables lined up over past two sessions. Should have held a massive book of overnight longs, as AAPL and JPM post market news will create a massive gap to the upside. Dimon buying 500,000 shares of JPM is huge news.</p>
<p>AAPL&#8217;s numbers reflect how CEO&#8217;s have brought expectations as low as logically possible, and from here, we are destined for upside surprises. I think market is past the 2/3 mark of the &#8220;accumulation&#8221; phase. As stock dries up, we&#8217;ll rally to areas that will shake more loose via profit taking from fast money, weaker players.  Definitely heading into the last stretch of accumulation before we see major mark-up in stocks.  I&#8217;m Concerned that another major chunk of this move will be in the overnights.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Good trade set-ups for remainder of month. Five more days of this type of activity, and you might &#8220;save&#8221; January and make it a monster month. Almost perfect environment for holding a huge line into this first thrust.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Push it. No holding back. No guts, no glory.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/jan21_market_thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journal Entry Week of January 5 2009</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/journal-entry-week-january-5-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/journal-entry-week-january-5-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAS plenty of room to the upside. Create long basket with this. MBI breakaway gap? Watch AGM, ACI SKF break below $100 pending&#8230;. CSUN watch closely DRYS target $18.50 EBAY &#8211; S2 in place, shallow but potent target ~$20. N/L ~$15.30 AAPL, GOOG multiple b/o&#8217;s. Watch for shakeout/recovery. MCHP, MRVL, NVDA, RIMM rally in progress SPY [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;">FAS plenty of room to the upside. Create long basket with this.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">MBI breakaway gap?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Watch AGM, ACI</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">SKF break below $100 pending&#8230;.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">CSUN watch closely</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">DRYS target $18.50</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">EBAY &#8211; S2 in place, shallow but potent target ~$20. N/L ~$15.30</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">AAPL, GOOG multiple b/o&#8217;s. Watch for shakeout/recovery.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">MCHP, MRVL, NVDA, RIMM rally in progress</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">SPY &amp; OIH target 96-97. Focus here. Would love a shakeout to $75</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">ERX &#8211; triple LONG energy multiple breakouts. Check WTI and Dubai. Breakout on good volume. Watch pullback to $40 for entry/shakeout.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">ERY &#8211; if energy complex rally false, this is triple SHORT energy. HUGE volume on Friday. Unusual.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">POT near n/l breakout with very shallow S2. AGU already through n/l so watch for shakeout.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">AKS at n/l</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">CLF through n/l</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">F- ready for another leg up.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Monitor solar and CHINA for breakouts. Possible breakout already in progress, may have to buy early and leave alone:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">FSLR, CSUN, CTRP, BIDU</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Will airlines pullback after taking off last week?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">DAL, LCC, AMR</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Goldman might pullback after 4 updays.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Possible 2xbottom in ISRG</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2009/01/journal-entry-week-january-5-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Week Stock Market Views</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/11/stock_market_election_week/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/11/stock_market_election_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Discipline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/11/389/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Week of November 3 THUR- Heavy volume on the sell-off. Market&#8217;s spooked by the lopsided gov&#8217;t. As expected, but didn&#8217;t exploit. Monitor airlines for entry levels (see below).  Many charts look like gaps from Tuesday were closed. Only problem is volume expanding across the board. So many charts look terrible, I feel like we&#8217;re going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Week of November 3</h2>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">THUR-<br />
Heavy volume on the sell-off. Market&#8217;s spooked by the lopsided gov&#8217;t. As expected, but didn&#8217;t exploit.<br />
Monitor airlines for entry levels (see below).  Many charts look like gaps from Tuesday were closed. Only problem is volume expanding across the board. So many charts look terrible, I feel like we&#8217;re going to revisit the lows. This is all because the Dem&#8217;s came 1 senate seet away from a super-majority. Maybe we will become full-blown, open, French style socialists. Who knows. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Short Looks-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">AGU, POT, AMX, BAC (maybe), CRM, FSLR, GENZ, GOOG (monitor), ISRG, PCLN, WLP, </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Long ideas-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">JPM, QID, SDS, SKF, UNG (lower), UYG (S2 around 7.30/.85), V (inside day on declining volume), </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">AAPL has huge support at 100. Monitor this for market directional clues.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">CHINA:</span></p>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">JASO- Breakaway gap on huge volume. Going to $9</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">LDK- Target $30. Shakeout type close on Tuesday, very bullish. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">PKX- Already gapped twice from 42 to 71. Breaking out on rising volume from 3 day consolidation.  First target $84</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">YGE- Target $11-$13</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">CEO- Target $110</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">CSUN- Resistance @ $6.70, 7.30, 8.40, 10.40</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">TSL- 1st target 20, 25, 28</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">CEA- </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">ZNH- Tradeable channel b/w $7 and $14. </span></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Solar and refiner stocks surging on volume. Oil services are exploding. Stay away from coal stocks.</span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Energy stocks to watch:</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">DNIN ($1.62)</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">HOC- 2x bottom w/ continuation b/o on Tuesday, taking prices back above lower boundary of d/t channel. Upper boundary around $32.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">DO- flag breakout. 91.40 short term MA resistance.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">DWSN- 2 consecutive inside days but volume HUGE on Tuesday. Expect breakout from deep oversold levels. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">EOG- 2x bottom, 2nd breakout. Trapped b/w 2 t/l&#8217;s but breakout is &gt;85.50</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">QNTA- Wind farm. Target $25-26</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">FCSX- Panic low</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">FTO- upper channel at 18.50</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">VLO- Target $30</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">HAL- Possible b/o on Tuesday. Buy &gt; 20.33 (wow, that&#8217;s cheap)</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">HES- Clear shot to 70 then 82 (alpha zone)</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">HTE- 2X bottom and 26% yield! Target is $15</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">IVAN- At lower channel $1 &#8211; $3.25</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">MUR- Flag breakout. Target 63-65</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">NE- &gt;34 will rally to 41-42</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;"><strong>NGAS- Huge buy signal, first target $5.75</strong></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;"><strong>NOV- 1st target $42, 2nd $46, 3rd $57</strong></span></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">POT- Target $113-114, </span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">A.Z $140 &#8211; $155 but first possible test of $68-70</span></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">AGU- Targets $50, $60</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">OXY- 3x bottom (inv. H&amp;S possible) &gt;58.65 targets $67 &amp; </span></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">$72</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">PDE- Target $25, $31</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">PTEN- Target $18</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">SII- 1st target $44, 2nd target $54</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">SLB- Perfect set up on Tuesday. </span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">SPN- Target 1 = $27, no resistance then until $36</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">CSIQ- Target 16.50 &#8211; 17.25</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">EMKR- tested lower boundary of multi-year rising channel.  1st resistance $5.25. Upper boundary $20</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">MEMC- (solar chip manufacturer). First target $35</span></strong></div>
<div><strong></strong></div>
<div><strong></strong></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Airline Stocks are overbought and should pull-in with rising CRB. However, longer term macro is very bullish for this group. So look for a 1-2 day pullback to buy into. Stocks to Monitor:</span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">AAI- Massive multi-month bottom</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">UAUA- Flirting w/ asc. triangle b/o but heavy convergence of resistance around $15.45. Measured target is $25, buy a dip to $12 if possible. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">AMR- Heavy resistance around 12. Above that level would be a huge breakout. 9.40-9.95 is a.z. support</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">CAL- Buyer $15.40 &#8211; $16.40</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">JBLU- Buyer $5.35</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">LCC- Monitor situation for possible pullback, but flirting with MAJOR breakout.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">LUV- % wise, has not rallied as much and came from $16 level, so could rally back to that level. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">RYAAY- Going to $31</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">SKYW- Massive 2x bottom on weekly, &gt;20 confirms (21 = a.z)</span></div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">WYNN- Could continue to 85-88.  Look to reverse short &gt;83<br />
X-<br />
tight range contraction just above short-term d/t line. global<br />
production cuts and iron ore output present positive tailwind for<br />
Steel.<br />
AKS- &gt;14  is $14.75, gap at 20.<br />
STLD- Possible target $20-21<br />
BTU: Target 40-44<br />
CHK: Asc. Tri. target = alpha zone $31<br />
CLF: Tradable 4-day broadening pattern but bearish overall.<br />
EOG: If trades above Fri. high, will taget 91.<br />
JRCC- Brokeout, could go to 24-26<br />
MOS- Gap $64-65<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">ICE- Set alarm  &lt; 65</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Tactical errors abundant in your book coming<br />
into Wed. Being unaware of MBIA&#8217;s calendar is inexcusable. Funny thing<br />
is yesterday, at the close, I realized my size in ABK had exceeded my<br />
comfort zone. Perhaps complacency was the reason why didn&#8217;t reduce<br />
immediately. Perhaps this was classic &#8220;false start&#8221; to what is<br />
ultimately expected in November with regards to market performance.<br />
When it&#8217;s all over, if down $30k on the week by Wed.&#8217;s close, it&#8217;s<br />
manageable. Mon &amp; Tue. had $20k in gains. If by close Wed. total<br />
loss is under $50k, I will call it just a slight bump in the road. If<br />
I&#8217;m going to have a &#8220;drawdown&#8221; after a long streak, it may as well<br />
happen in a single day. Much healthier for the psyche this way.  For the time being, all overnight positions are banned. Hypothetically, if a sustained rally is expected, overnight position concentrations are still unwarranted. Smaller size in multiple names is better than concentrated positions in a few names (ala Tuesday night).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Markets gapped down due to economic numbers but snapped back<br />
aggressively. Energy stocks, natural gas specifically, as well as Ag&#8217;s,<br />
are ripping higher. Overnight idea was not &#8220;wrong&#8221;, the execution and<br />
stock selection was wrong. &#8220;super majority&#8221; was narrowly missed, but it<br />
was getting close near the end. Missed by 1 or 2 seats in the Senate,<br />
so the rally can continue.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">WED am:</span></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Chinese stocks about to explode higher. Find the long basket to focus on here.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Market&#8217;s saw a breakaway gap on Tuesday, with<br />
SPX gapping above prior 2 day high, unable to close gap, then taking<br />
new highs. Charts across the board are showing continuation and/or<br />
breakouts. CRB index looks set for a multi-day rally. Quantitative data<br />
implies November during election year can produce largest single month<br />
gains, with high accuracy. So aggressive long posture is warranted.<br />
Energy &amp; commodity names look good, along with technology and some<br />
financial stocks. Financials appear to have some headwind still.<br />
Airline index could surge higher even though stocks have run. If bank<br />
index rallies early on Wed, it should continue through the end of the<br />
week. </span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Democratic White House and Congress should be<br />
VERY bullish for Solar and other other clean energy names while being<br />
VERY bearish for Coal stocks. This is why solar stocks have exploded<br />
and should continue to rally in November. Likely to outperform broader<br />
market by several factors.</span></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">Monday was a non-event on the broad market, but stock selective continues to produce good results. I&#8217;m still bearish going into Tuesday because of the chance Democrats achieve super-majority plus white house. Market will open down big on Wed. if this happens. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">MON morning:<br />
I expect a major crash on Tuesday/Wed. if Democrats take Executive and Legislative branches with super-majority. This looks more and more likely every hour. We could see rally early on Monday, with afternoon sell-off continuing into Tuesday and gapping down huge on Wed. For the short side, focus on double inverse ETF&#8217;s:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">QID, SKF (trgt 170), SDS (109 trgt), DXD</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Go long UNG as macro play for high payoff trade. At critical inflection point ($28-30), first target $35.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Bank Index setting up solid bottoming pattern and showing early strength. Will run to 70. Back up the truck on the financial plays below.  Five year tsy yld looks like it has one more push to 3.10. 10yr yld to 4.175% very bullish for stocks. 30yr to 4.45%.<br />
VIX on its way to 49-50<br />
CRB index at major support but still must test 235.<br />
Airline Index breakout thru n/l of inv. H&amp;S but approaching heavy resistance at 28.<br />
NYSE New Lows falling but New Highs not moving yet.  Implies upside potential could be huge, or we have one big washout move to the downside coming very soon. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ABK</strong></span>-  Stocks at a crucial juncture here. The inv. H&amp;S is compelling but pattern could turn into a sym. triangle consolidation of downtrend. It&#8217;s in the middle of a broadening d/t channel. Only save against sym. triangle scenario is fact that prices well into apex of triangle. Move above 2.95 and 3.00 could be the b/o.<br />
</span>AGM- Look for any retrace to establish long. Target $21.<br />
<strong>MBI-</strong> 2x bottom at S2 will confirm &gt;10.55. 1st trgt 14.50 then $18. Size up<br />
ZION- High short interest with bullish pattern and potential b.o on Friday.<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial;">BBT- Size up per volume. Support from 32-34. Target $45.<br />
JPM- On its way to the top end of broadening channel around $51- $53 (SVB similar patter with target 73)<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">MS- Going to $30<br />
GS- Continue to accum 90-92 target 100-104 then 109-110.<br />
BAC- Targets 27, 29, 33<br />
WFC- Breaking out with huge converging support levels underneath at 31-33. Rally in WB shows expectations of WFC rally from arbitrage players. Target $45<br />
UYG- Headed to $13 (a.z.) then 15.40. Either 2x bottom or inv. H&amp;S w/ S1 &amp; H completed. Expanding vol. on Fri., confirming d-SAR Long trigger from Thur.. Dbl. Long trigger Stoch.<br />
BK- Solid looking inv. H&amp;S. Size up.<br />
V- Closed just below d/t line. ma&#8217;s turning up. Monday, d/t line is 55.40 but Fri&#8217;s high is 56. Initial buy through d/t line with aggressive accum. above 56.<br />
FIG- Size up, could jump 80% fast.<br />
GROW- Possible S2. Breakout &gt;7.67<br />
HBAN- Support at $8.85. size up target $14</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">CIEN- Picking up momentum after confirming s/t bottom. First resis. $11.50 then $16. Good risk/reward set-up. Size up on this.<br />
DNA- HUGE support at $80 &#8211; $82.  Ideal trade to gear up using options. Breakout &gt; 85.25.  Accumulate position. Expect improved bid from Roche and possible bidding war. Original offer $89. Likely offer $101.<br />
AAPL- Buy $100-101, moving avg. convergence (24ema &amp; 10sma). Short term rising t/l $96.50<br />
AMZN- Closed at highs on Friday with rising volume. Clear shot to $63. Monitor for test of 54. Next support is 51.<br />
RIMM- Target $65<br />
FSLR- Working on 2x bottom w/ target of 200-207. Buy weakness, especially early morning.<br />
GOOG- Trapped between converging tecnical zones. <strong>If breaks down, buy at $336</strong>. First a.z. $400, 2nd a.z. $435.<br />
CRM- Continue monitoring for color.<br />
VMW- Next resistance 35 &#8211; 37<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">BIDU- Recover and re-test of 200 complete. Closed above prior support before false breakdown.  Target 1: 238  Target 2: 255 (gap and d/t line converge)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
CELG- Closed above 3x convergence support @ 64. Target $75<br />
GENZ- Above 74 is major b/o.<br />
SQNM- Try to buy 14-15</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p>SHORT:<br />
CNX at major resistance and d/t line but bullish divergence in breadth.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/11/stock_market_election_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Big Picture Behind the Financial Meltdown of 2008</title>
		<link>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/10/macroview_hedgefund_collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/10/macroview_hedgefund_collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarketWizard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bearish Looks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals & Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Discipline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/10/387/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We&#8217;re going to see five hedge funds fail for every bank, maybe more,&#8221; A moment of reckoning for many hedge funds may come at the end of this month, when their exposure to credit default swaps must be &#8220;marked to market&#8221; to reflect the increased obligations at the end of the third quarter. Olivant, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to see five hedge funds fail for every bank, maybe more,&#8221;</p>
<p>A moment of reckoning for many hedge funds may come at the end of this month, when their exposure to credit default swaps must be &#8220;marked to market&#8221; to reflect the increased obligations at the end of the third quarter.</p>
<p>Olivant, the investment group run by former Abbey boss Luqman Arnold, revealed last week that its 2.8% stake in UBS was held through an account at Lehman in London which the firm’s administrators are refusing to release.</p>
<p>Oct. 3 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Maverick Capital Ltd., <a href="https://www.greenlightcapital.com/" target="_blank">Greenlight Capital LLC</a> and The Children&#8217;s Investment Fund Management LLP fell more than 12 percent in September as stock hedge funds posted record monthly losses and braced for client defections. <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Lee+Ainslie&amp;site=wnews&amp;client=wnews&amp;proxystylesheet=wnews&amp;output=xml_no_dtd&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;filter=p&amp;getfields=wnnis&amp;sort=date:D:S:d1">Lee Ainslie</a>&#8216;s Maverick Capital declined 19.5 percent and Greenlight Capital, run by <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=David+Einhorn&amp;site=wnews&amp;client=wnews&amp;proxystylesheet=wnews&amp;output=xml_no_dtd&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;filter=p&amp;getfields=wnnis&amp;sort=date:D:S:d1">David Einhorn</a>, was down 12.8 percent, according to investors in the New York-based funds. Children&#8217;s Investment, overseen by <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Chris+Hohn&amp;site=wnews&amp;client=wnews&amp;proxystylesheet=wnews&amp;output=xml_no_dtd&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;filter=p&amp;getfields=wnnis&amp;sort=date:D:S:d1">Chris Hohn</a> in London, fell 15 percent, based on a preliminary estimate.</p>
<p>Stock hedge funds fell an average of 8.6 percent in September, the biggest one-month loss since <a href="http://www.hfr.com/" target="_blank">Hedge Fund Research Inc.</a> began collecting data in 1990. While that was better than the 12 percent decline by the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=MXWO%3AIND">MSCI World Index</a>, a benchmark for global stocks, industry analysts expect investors to increase their requests to pull money from funds. The poor performance of certain hedge funds will have repercussions in the allocation processes, and it may lead to substantial shifts between hedge-funds strategies and between hedge funds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other managers with above-average losses for the month included <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Stephen+Mandel&amp;site=wnews&amp;client=wnews&amp;proxystylesheet=wnews&amp;output=xml_no_dtd&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;filter=p&amp;getfields=wnnis&amp;sort=date:D:S:d1">Stephen Mandel</a>, whose main Lone Cypress fund in<br />
Greenwich, Connecticut, fell 14.7 percent. New York-based Third Point LLC, run by <a href="http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Daniel+Loeb&amp;site=wnews&amp;client=wnews&amp;proxystylesheet=wnews&amp;output=xml_no_dtd&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;filter=p&amp;getfields=wnnis&amp;sort=date:D:S:d1">Daniel Loeb</a>, dropped 11 percent. Officials for the hedge funds declined to comment or didn&#8217;t return calls.</p>
<p>Defensive Doesn&#8217;t Work</p>
<p>Funds in all investment categories fell 6.9 percent in September, according to Hedge Fund Research&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=HFRXGL%3AIND">Global Hedge Fund Index</a>. <em><strong>That&#8217;s the worst month for the $1.9 trillion industry since August 1998, when the Russian debt default triggered the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management LP. </strong></em></p>
<p>Key Problems:</p>
<ul>
<li> <em>LIBOR bid only, no offer. </em></li>
<li> <em>Commercial paper market shut down, little trading and no issuance. </em></li>
<li> <em>Corporations have no access to long or short term credit markets &#8212; hence they face massive rollover problems. </em></li>
<li> <em>Brokers are increasingly not dealing with each other. </em></li>
<li> <em>Even the inter-bank market is ceasing up</em></li>
</ul>
<p><em><br />
The Treasury Tarp plan is an irrelevance if we are at a major funding crisis.<br />
</em></p>
<p>We are indeed at the cardiac arrest stage and at risk of the mother of all bank and non-bank runs as:</p>
<p>-<strong>The run on the shadow banking system is accelerating</strong> as: even the surviving major broker dealers (Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs) are under severe pressure Morgan losing over a third of its hedge funds clients); the run on hedge funds is accelerating via massive  redemptions and a roll-off of their overnight repo lines; the money market funds are experiencing further withdrawals in spite of government blanket guarantee.</p>
<p>-<strong>A <a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor/253818/roubini_sees_silent_run_on_banks_urges_triage_bloomberg_radio_interview">silent run on the commercial banks is underway</a></strong>. In Q2 of 2008 the FDIC reported $4462bn insured domestic deposits out of $7036bn total domestic deposits; thus, <strong>only </strong><strong>63% of domestic deposits are insured</strong><strong>.</strong> Thus $ 2574bn of deposits were not insured. Given the risk that many banks – small, regional and national – may go bust (as even large ones such as WaMu and Wachovia went recently bust) there is now a silent run on parts of the banking system. Deposit insurance formally covers only deposits up to $100000. Thus any individual, small or large business and/or foreign investor or financial institution with more than $100000 in a FDIC insured bank is now legitimately concerned about the safety of its deposits. Even if as likely the deposit insurance limit will be temporarily raised to $250000 by Congress there will still be a whopping $1.9 trillion of uninsured deposits (or 73% of total deposits); thus, a huge mass of uninsured deposits will remain at risk as even small businesses have usually more than $250K of cash while medium sized and large firms as well as any domestic and foreign financial institution or investor with exposure to US banks has average exposure in the millions of dollars. Particularly at risk are the cross border mostly short term interbank lines of US banks with their foreign counterparties that are estimated to be close to $800 billion.</p>
<p>-<strong>A run on the short term liabilities of the corporate sector is also underway </strong>as the commercial paper market has effectively shut down with little trading and no issuance or rollover of such debt while corporations have no access to long or short term credit markets and they are therefore facing massive rollover problems (over $500 billion of rollover of maturing debts in the next 12 months). Indeed, the market for commercial paper plummeted $94.9 billion to $1.6 trillion for the week ended Oct. 1 (and down over $200 billion in the last three weeks). Especially banks and insurers were unable to find buyers for the short-term debt: financial paper accounted for most of the decline, plunging $64.9 billion, or 8.7 percent in the last week; but now even non-financial corporations are also experiencing a severe roll-off in the CP market. Discount rates for investment-grade non-financial commercial paper spiked to 599bp for 60 day maturities. More companies are borrowing against or tapping their revolving credit lines. This is largely due to the dislocation caused in the money markets by the failure of Lehman and the subsequent withdrawals from money market funds, which are some of the biggest providers of liquidity in the short term funding/commercial paper. Even the largest corporations are at severe stress: ATT last week was forced to rely on overnight funding for its treasury operations, as lenders were unwilling to provide more long term financing due to fears in money market funds over investor redemption. The CEO said <em>“It’s loosened up a bit, but it’s day-to-day right now. I mean literally it’s day-to-day in terms of what our access to the capital markets looks like,’’</em> Things are much worse for non-investment grade corporations and for small and medium sized businesses. As reported today by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMYRQ9QQjk3E&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg</a>: <em>Almost 100 U.S. corporate treasurers gathered for an emergency conference call yesterday to warn each other that banks are using any excuse to charge<br />
more to renew lines of credit. </em></p>
<p>-<strong>The money markets and interbank markets have shut down</strong> as &#8211; <strong>despite the Senate passing the bail-out bill -</strong> yesterday USD Overnight Libor was still at 268bp after reaching an all-time high of 6.88%; the USD 3m Libor-OIS spread widened to record 270 basis points; EUR 3m LIBOR-OIS spread is at record 130bp; the TED spread is at record 360bps (TED was 11bps one month ago); Money and credit markets are dysfunctional also in<a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/10003"> emerging markets </a>; and agency bond spreads are also at highs again.</p>
<p>So we are now facing:</p>
<p>- a silent run on the huge mass of uninsured deposits of the banking system and even a run on some insured deposits are small depositors are scared;</p>
<p>- a run on most of the shadow banking system: over 300 non bank mortgage lenders are now bust; the SIVs and conduits are now all bust; the five major brokers dealers are now bust (Bear and Lehman) or still under severe stress even after they have been converted into banks (Merrill, Morgan, Goldman); a run on money market funds restrained only by a blanket government guarantee; a serious run on hedge funds; a looming refinancing crisis for private equity firms and LBOs);</p>
<p>- a run on the short term liabilities of the corporate sector as the commercial paper market has totally frozen (and experiencing a roll-off) while access to medium terms and long term financings for<br />
corporations is frozen at a time when hundreds of billions of dollars of maturing debts need to be rolled over;</p>
<p>- a total seizure of the interbank and money markets.</p>
<p>This is indeed a cardiac arrest for the shadow and non-shadow banking system and for the system of financing of the corporate sector. The shutdown of financing for the corporate system is particularly<br />
scary: solvent but illiquid corporations that cannot roll over their maturing debt may now face massive defaults due to this illiquidity. And if the financing of the corporate sectors shuts down and remains<br />
shut down the risk of an economic collapse similar to the Great Depression becomes highly likely.</p>
<p>So what needs to be done?<br />
Even several hundreds of billion dollars in emergency liquidity support to the financial system by the Fed and other central banks in the last week alone have not been enough to stop the seizure of liquidity in interbank markets and the shut down of financing for the corporate sector as counter-party risk is now extreme (no one trusts any more in this crisis of confidence even the most reputable and trustworthy financial and corporate counter-parties).</p>
<p>Thus, emergency times where we are at risk of a systemic meltdown require emergency measures. These include the following six ideas, which are also the key points to be listening for as potential catalysts for sudden market surges to the upside:</p>
<p>-A temporary six-month blanket guarantee on <strong>all</strong> US deposits (not just those below $250k) combined with a rapid triage between insolvent banks that should be quickly closed and distressed but solvent – conditional on liquidity and capital injections – banks that should be rescued. To stop the silent run on the banking system you do need now such blanket guarantee on all (insured and uninsured) deposit regardless of their size. To minimize lender moral hazard from such action the blanket guarantee needs to be followed by a very rapid triage and shut-down of insolvent institutions to prevent such institutions from gambling for redemption, i.e. acquiring more deposits and making even more risky loans. To limit such moral hazard distortions one can also limit the extended guarantee only to current deposits: i.e. any new deposit above a $100k limit will not be insured.</p>
<p>- Extension of the emergency liquidity support of the Fed (both TSLF and PDCF) to a broader range of institutions in the shadow banking system, especially those directly providing credit to the corporate sector. The TSLF and PDCF are already available to some non banks (the broker dealers that are primary dealers of the Fed). But two of such broker dealers are gone (Bear and Lehman) and the other three are under stress. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, the other primary dealers and the banks that have access to the TSLF and PDCF (and discount window) have massively used these facilities in the last few weeks; but they are hoarding such liquidity and not re-lending it to other banks, to the thousands of the other members of the shadow banking system and to the corporate sector as they need such liquidity and don’t trust any counter-party. Thus the transmission mechanism of credit policy (the non-traditional Fed liquidity lines) is completely shut down now.</p>
<p>- Some members of the shadow banking system will not receive such liquidity support of the Fed (hedge funds and private equity funds) as – fairly or unfairly &#8211; there is no political sympathy for such institutions. This means that the demise of hundreds – and possibly thousands – of hedge funds will occur as redemptions and roll off of overnight repo financing for leveraged investments will cause a massive liquidity – and thus solvency – crisis for such institutions. If hundreds of smaller hedge funds collapse the systemic consequences would be limited (even if in the aggregate hedge funds provide significant financing to the corporate sector). If larger and systemically important hedge funds were at risk of failing the Fed will have to engineer a massive private sector bail-in of such hedge funds (a larger scale rescue a la LTCM) where the prime brokers of such funds are forced to maintain repo exposure to such funds rather than be allowed to shut off such exposure. This is a radical suggestion but the alternative of a Fed liquidity bailout of systemically important hedge fund is not politically feasible given the little sympathy that such funds enjoy in Congress. The refinancing crisis of private equity firms and their LBOs is a longer fuse run as covenant-lite clause and PIK toggles will postpone such financing crisis but make the harder the fall as zombie corporations that postpone restructuring will have a bigger collapse once the financing crisis eventually occurs. But since many of these LBOs should have never occurred in the first place any financing crisis for such buy-outs should be dealt with in bankruptcy court; no public funds should be used to rescue such LBOs and the reckless private equity firms that designed such schemes.</p>
<p>- Direct lending to the business sector from the Fed via extension of the PDCF and TSLF to the non financial corporate sector. This could include Fed purchases of commercial paper from corporations and other forms of financing of the short term liabilities of the Administration to small businesses secured in appropriate ways. Given the collapse of the corporate CP market and the banking system reluctance to provide loans to the corporate sector (credits lines are being shut down) the only alternative to the Fed becoming directly the biggest emergency bank for the corporate sector would be to force the banking system to maintain its exposure to the corporate sector, possibly in exchange for further Fed provision of liquidity to the banking system. The former option may be better than the latter to deal with the looming illiquidity of the corporate sector.</p>
<p>- Have a coordinated 100bps reduction in policy rates by all major advanced economies central bank and, possibly, even some emerging market economies central banks. While this policy rates may not directly resolve the insolvency issues in financial markets and in the corporate sector it may ease liquidity pressures and it would signal that global policy makers are serious about addressing together this most extreme liquidity and financial crisis. Also, some of the radical policy actions that have been suggested here for the US will most likely need to be undertaken also by European policy makers as the liquidity and credit crisis is now becoming global.<br />
-          <a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor/253783/is_purchasing_700_billion_of_toxic_assets_the_best_way_to_recapitalize_the_financial_system_no_it_is_rather_a_disgrace_and_rip-off_benefitting_only_the_shareholders_and_unsecured_creditors_of_banks">Radically redesign the Treasury TARP rescue plan – possibly after its necessary approval today &#8211; to make it effective, efficient and fair</a>. This implies that in addition to a more limited government purchase of toxic assets, you need: a) an emergency triage between insolvent and illiquid and under-capitalized but solvent banks should be made; b) a sharp reduction of the mortgage debt burden of the insolvent household sector; c) and a recapitalization of solvent banks to be done via public injection of preferred shares and matching contributions by current shareholders of the banks. Financial markets have already voted no to this plan (that is flawed in its current form) yesterday when after its passage in the Senate US and global equity markets plunged another 4% while money markets and credit markets seized up even further.<br />
<em><br />
<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bottom Line Conclusion:</span></strong></em><br />
This credit crisis is both a crisis of confidence and illiquidity and a crisis of credit and solvency. But while the insolvent institutions should go bust we have now reached a point where many financial institutions and now non financial firms may become insolvent because of pure illiquidity; and this would lead to an extremely severe economic contraction similar to an economic depression rather than a mild recession. At this point the US, the advanced economies (and now likely even some emerging market economies) will experience an ugly recession and an ugly financial and banking crisis regardless of what we do from now on. What radical policy action can only do is preventing what will now be an ugly and nasty two-year recession and financial crisis from turning into a systemic meltdown and a decade long economic depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentcapitalist.com/2008/10/macroview_hedgefund_collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
